Sea level

Nils-Axel Mörner is the foremost expert on sea level, and his latest papers.

Changes in global sea level is an issue of much controversy. In the Kattegatt Sea, the glacial isostatic component factor is well established and the axis of tilting has remained stable for the last 8000 years. At the point of zero regional crustal movements, there are three tide gauges indicating a present rise in sea level of 0.8 to 0.9 mm/yr for the last 125 years. This value provides a firm
record of the regional eustatic rise in sea level in this part of the globe.

Read more, Paper 589 – Sea level

Roald J. Larsen (Top of page)  –  Google+  –  Roald J. Larsen (Blogspot)  –  Twitter  –  Facebook  –  Skype: roaldjl2009

Answer to one Leslie Graham in a blogpost 10.07.2014

Sea level rise

Biribo, N. and Woodroffe, C.D. 2013. Historical area and shoreline change of reef islands around Tarawa Atoll, Kiribati. Sustainability Science 8: 345-362.

According to Biribo and Woodroffe (2013), “low-lying reef islands on atolls appear to be threatened by impacts of observed and anticipated sea-level rise,” noting that “widespread flooding in the interior of Fongafale on Funafuti Atoll, in Tuvalu, is often cited as confirmation that ‘islands are sinking’ (Patel, 2006).” But is this really the case?

In an attempt to find out, Biribo and Woodroffe examined changes in shoreline position on the majority of reef islands on Tarawa Atoll, the capital of the Republic of Kiribati, by analyzing “reef-island area and shoreline change over 30 years determined by comparing 1968 and 1998 aerial photography using geographical information systems.”

In describing their findings, first of all, the two Australian researchers state that the reef islands of Tarawa Atoll “substantially increased in size, gaining about 450 ha, driven largely by reclamations on urban South Tarawa, accounting for 360 ha (~80% of the net change).” And of the 40 islands of North Tarawa, where population is absent or sparse, they report that “25 of the reef islands in this area showed no change at the level of detection, 13 showed net accretion and only two displayed net erosion.” In addition, they indicate that “similar reports of reef island area increase have been observed on urban Majuro, in the Marshall Islands, again mainly related to human activity,” citing Ford (2012). And they say that “a recent analysis of changes in area of 27 reef islands from several Pacific atolls for periods of 35 or 61 years concluded that they were growing (Webb and Kench, 2010),” likely “as a result of more prolific coral growth and enhanced sediment transport on reef flats when the sea is higher,” under which conditions they note that “shorelines will actually experience accretion, thus increasing reef island size (Kinsey and Hopley, 1991).”

Biribo and Woodroffe conclude that “despite the widely held perception that reef islands around the perimeter of coral atolls are eroding and will disappear as a consequence of sea-level rise resulting from global warming, this study shows that the total area of reef islands on Tarawa Atoll has increased over recent decades,” just as it has also done on many other reef islands.

Additional References
Ford, M. 2012. Shoreline changes on an urban atoll in the central Pacific Ocean: Majuro Atoll, Marshall Islands. Journal of Coastal Research 28: 11-22.

Kinsey, D.W. and Hopley, D. 1991. The significance of coral reefs as global carbon sinks – response to Greenhouse. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 89: 363-377.

Patel, S.S. 2006. Climate science: a sinking feeling. Nature 440: 734-736.

Webb, A.P. and Kench, P.S. 2010. The dynamic response of reef islands to sea-level rise: evidence from multi-decadal analysis of island change in the central Pacific. Global and Planetary Change 72: 234-246.

Why is this relevant to what you are saying?

Because, if there was anything near what you claim, without any ice added, meaning net loss of ice, you would see sea-level rise. I documented it’s not rising by the report, with references. Another thing that happens when the sea-level is rising, is that the earth slows down, it’s not spinning as fast. 24 hours might be longer, prolonged by 1/1000 part or less/more of a second/year, for example. No such decrease has been observed. I have now presented you with basic science in two different scientific branches, both falsify your hypothesis.

Roald J. Larsen (Top of page)  –  Google+  –  Roald J. Larsen (Blogspot)  –  Twitter  –  Facebook  –  Skype: roaldjl2009


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s