A Stunning Indictment Of UHI

It’s hard to make people understand how important this is ..!

Real Science

NOAA and NASA say UHI isn’t important.  Compare these two stations in Louisiana 50 miles apart.


Screenshot 2016-01-30 at 08.22.19 PM

Screenshot 2016-01-30 at 08.14.54 PM


Screenshot 2016-01-30 at 08.21.02 PM

Screenshot 2016-01-30 at 08.14.38 PM

The frequency of hot days at the rural station has plummeted, while they have skyrocketed at the urban station. And then we get a double fraud through homogenization.

View original post


One thought on “A Stunning Indictment Of UHI

  1. “It appears that these natural cycles affect temperature and natural levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) which then fluctuate over a wide range. This paper states that it is unlikely to have caused any warming, while this article concludes that, even if developed countries reduced CO₂emissions, developing countries would not. Worldwide measurements indicate a rise of 1 degree F (or 0.55 degree C) since 1880 but there is a lot of possible error in such measurements going back a hundred years. What is likely to be closer to the mark is the following graph of U.S. surface temperature measurements ..:”


    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s